From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20483 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 15:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20264 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 15:54:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO darkstar.welcomehome.org) (192.203.188.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 May 2003 15:54:08 -0000 Received: (from rob@localhost) by darkstar.welcomehome.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4JFZcg27159; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:35:38 -0600 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:54:00 -0000 From: Rob Savoye To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: dejagnu@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu Message-ID: <20030519093538.B26518@welcomehome.org> References: <20030518235710.A10509@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030518235710.A10509@lucon.org>; from H. J. Lu on Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:57:10PM -0700 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:57:10PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > BTW, is anyone working on dejagnu? I have found and fixed 3 bugs > in less than 2 weeks since I was forced to use dejagnu 1.4.3. I didn't > get any reponses nor any indications those bugs would be fixed any Yes, somebody is still working on it, classically as a "side gig" to my income generating work... I've encorporated all your patches into my local source tree, and as they were mostly obvious, I didn't feel a need for discussion. I still have to test them. Personally, if you don't like DejaGnu don't use it... or implement something better. Dissing DejaGnu isn't really a good way to get me to respond. DejaGnu is over 12 years old, and could use some work to make it more up to date. Maybe someday I'll have that much (free) time, but till then, about all I can do is keep patching it so it's at least useful to the GNU development tools, since not too many other projects bother to do any real testing. As almost nobody else has ever stepped forward to help with maintaining DejaGnu, it's pretty much a solo effort. I unfortunately find my new GNU project (http://www.senecass.com/abelmon/) way more stimulating than hacking on regression testing frameworks full-time for another 12 years. - rob -