From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5800 invoked by alias); 28 May 2003 22:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5718 invoked from network); 28 May 2003 22:23:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (204.176.21.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 May 2003 22:23:25 -0000 Received: (from jbuck@localhost) by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4SMNGU08475; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:23:16 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:23:00 -0000 From: Joe Buck To: Robert Dewar Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, mrs@apple.com, neroden@twcny.rr.com Subject: Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems) Message-ID: <20030528152316.A8462@synopsys.com> References: <20030528221127.3FDE1F2D82@nile.gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030528221127.3FDE1F2D82@nile.gnat.com>; from dewar@gnat.com on Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:11:27PM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:11:27PM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote: > I have not seen any substantive argument for using other than the GPL here. > That's what would be useful. The only reason for using something other than the GPL is if a function turns out to be needed in a language support library as well. Otherwise it suffices if the license is GPL or GPL-compatible.