From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13992-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11116 invoked by alias); 28 May 2003 22:11:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10972 invoked from network); 28 May 2003 22:11:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 May 2003 22:11:27 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 3FDE1F2D82; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: ac131313@redhat.com, jbuck@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com, mrs@apple.com, neroden@twcny.rr.com
Message-Id: <20030528221127.3FDE1F2D82@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:11:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2

I have not seen any substantive argument for using other than the GPL here.
That's what would be useful.