From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14002-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15488 invoked by alias); 29 May 2003 13:51:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15456 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 13:51:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc02.attbi.com) (204.127.202.62)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 13:51:56 -0000
Received: from lucon.org (12-234-88-5.client.attbi.com[12.234.88.5])
          by attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with ESMTP
          id <20030529135155002006d9g4e>; Thu, 29 May 2003 13:51:55 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E85B82C683; Thu, 29 May 2003 06:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:51:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@myrealbox.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, binutils <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: parallel builds failing in bfd
Message-ID: <20030529065154.A29255@lucon.org>
References: <ro1d6i2pw6r.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <20030528220621.GA24942@nevyn.them.org> <3ED53CC0.9040305@myrealbox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <3ED53CC0.9040305@myrealbox.com>; from nwourms@myrealbox.com on Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:48:32PM -0400
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:48:32PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:01:48PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> > 
> >>Every once in a while, when I do a parallel build from the top level,
> >>I get a failure that stems from bfd.h being built incorrectly.  Do
> >>other people run into this problem?  I'm not at all familiar with
> >>bfd's Makefile.in, so I don't know offhand what might be causing this
> >>problem.
> > 
> > 
> > It's an autoconf 2.13 bug unfortunately.  It will be fixed after the
> > 2.5x transition, which is starting to gain a little momentum now.
> > 
> 
> BTW, are there any plans to transition to Automake-1.7.X & 
> Libtool-1.5.X, now that they have stabilized?  It sure would be nice to 

FYI, the current binutils/gdb tree doesn't work with

# make install DESTDIR=foo

when shared library is enabled due to the libtool bug. I put a kludge
in my Linux binutils. I hope it gets fixed soon.


H.J.