From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9569 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2003 19:33:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9484 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 19:33:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.153) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2003 19:33:04 -0000 Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-24-19-190.twcny.rr.com [24.24.19.190]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h53JX2ik005263; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:33:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19NHWk-0008NE-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 15:32:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:33:00 -0000 To: jsm28@cam.ac.uk Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Libiberty licensing problems & solutions [DRAFT] Message-ID: <20030603193258.GA32189@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 Joseph Myers said: >Apart from this, libiberty manual licensing is a mess in other ways I'm not touching the manual licensing at the moment. I'm opposed to the GFDL, particularly with "Invariant Sections", and so I'm not going to do anything to help it. I may request that the manual be relicensed at some point, but I'm trying to separate that from the hopefully non-controversial relicensings I'm discussing in my draft letter. --Nathanael