From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1551 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2003 14:24:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1535 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 14:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO conn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 14:24:15 -0000 Received: from grante.comtrol.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BDDB98192 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:24:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 26744 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2003 14:19:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:24:00 -0000 From: Grant Edwards To: Raja Saleru Cc: Gdb Subject: Re: GDB Server - remote serial protocol Message-ID: <20030604091904.A26714@visi.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from iap_sraja@access.co.jp on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:34:29AM +0900 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:34:29AM +0900, Raja Saleru wrote: Dude, fix the date on your system. It's 2003. At least in this part of the world.... > while remote debugging the application using gdb and gdbserver, > the user at host side can use the remote protocol commands only > ? or standard gdb commands ? or both ? The user uses standard gdb commands. The remote protocol is strictly an internal thing that the two gdbs use to talk to each other. -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com