From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Use of lval_register?
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030605162338.GB30522@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EDF6C02.90807@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 12:12:50PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:50:00AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
> >>>lval_reg_frame_relative is a relatively recent addition, I believe,
> >>>added to fix some particular problem with values stored in two places.
> >>>Probably around the HP merge? But that's just a guess.
> >
> >>
> >>Ah.
> >>
> >
> >>>I think that lval_reg_frame_relative, lval_memory, and lval_register
> >>>should all be combined to an lval_location which takes the frame and a
> >>>description of a location, personally.
> >
> >>
> >>These will all need to live in harmony for a wile though.
>
> Actually, these are separate but related problems:
>
> - a location expression determines that a value is in REGNUM N in FRAME F.
>
> - the CFI then determines that REGNUM N in frame F is actually in REGNUM
> M in frame G.
>
> Printing a variable relies on both mechanisms, printing $r1 uses just
> the first.
>
> >>The ``print $1''? That output is correct. GDB saves the value so that
> >>it can be refered back to later without having it change.
>
> >Oh right. So the value is coming from the cache.
>
> It's comming from GDB's infinite value history pool (the word cache
> suggests that it is eventually flushed, which it isn't :-).
>
> >
> >
> >>>I guess the question is, what _should_ happen if a variable moves?
> >>>e.g. we switch to a different item on its location list.
> >
> >>
> >>From the users view point, the variable hasn't moved. Hence the
> >>assignment:
> >>
> >> $1.argc = N
> >>
> >>should always work. Should that assignment update the cached $1 value
> >>as well, hmm....
> >
> >
> >I think it should update the cached copy. I'm not so sure it should
> >update the in-memory copy, if the var has moved. That would require
> >re-evaluating the expression that produced $1 wouldn't it?
>
> Eventually. For the moment I'm just worred about getting it to
> re-evaluate the registers the value is assumed to reside in.
>
> Or should it only modify the history pool (modifying memory is weird
> here, but where to draw the line is also weird).
After some more thought, I suppose it should modify both the pool and
memory. It's just not clear how to find out where in memory it should
be, now...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-05 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 14:35 Andrew Cagney
2003-06-05 15:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-05 15:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-05 15:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-05 16:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-05 16:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-06-05 17:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-05 18:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030605162338.GB30522@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).