From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5407 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2003 21:33:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5294 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2003 21:33:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2003 21:33:28 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 9B6A6D2DAF; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 21:33:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: GDB build & test report Message-ID: <20030609213314.GV1067@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 FYI, I have sucessfully built GDB from CVS HEAD on the following platforms: - sparc-solaris 2.5, 2,8, and 2.9 - pa-hpux 11 (32 bits ABI) - alpha-tru64 (4.0f and 5.1a) - ppc-aix 4.3.2 (*) and 5.1 - mips-irix 6.5 I ran the testsuite and quickly compared the numbers with the results obtained with GDB 5.3, and they are encourageing (basically, I just looked at the number of PASSes and FAILs). I thought this might be nice to know just before we cut the 6.0 branch. :) -- Joel (*): There is a build failure on ppc-aix 4.x, for which I have submitted a patch. Hopefully, it will be included before we create the gdb-6 branch... But once the patch is applied, it builds and tests fine.