From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12271 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2003 23:06:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12226 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2003 23:06:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2003 23:06:06 -0000 Received: from dsl093-172-017.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.17] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19PVix-00016I-00; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:06:47 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19PViC-000096-00; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 19:06:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 23:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Christopher Faylor , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Message-ID: <20030609230559.GA27649@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandre Oliva , Christopher Faylor , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:58:30PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun 9, 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I agree. It's sort of odd to have important gcc issues like this talked > > about somewhere outside of the gcc.gnu.org domain. > > I've always wanted us to have toplevel@ or > configure@sources.redhat.com, for all projects hosted in s.r.c., and > GCC too, just because GCC shares most of the top-level files with > that. Can't we go ahead and create one of these lists, in which we'll > discuss not only this transition, but also any patches that affect the > top level alone? I think this is the perfect time for such a list :) -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer