From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9804 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2003 23:58:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9788 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2003 23:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2003 23:58:17 -0000 Received: from dsl093-172-017.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.17] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19PWJg-0001Bn-00; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:44:44 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19PWIu-0005Ws-00; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 19:43:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 23:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joe Buck Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Christopher Faylor , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Message-ID: <20030609234355.GA21222@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Buck , Alexandre Oliva , Christopher Faylor , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:38:36PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I agree. It's sort of odd to have important gcc issues like this talked > > > about somewhere outside of the gcc.gnu.org domain. > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:58:30PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > I've always wanted us to have toplevel@ or > > configure@sources.redhat.com, for all projects hosted in s.r.c., and > > GCC too, just because GCC shares most of the top-level files with > > that. Can't we go ahead and create one of these lists, in which we'll > > discuss not only this transition, but also any patches that affect the > > top level alone? > > So first Christopher objects to a list having @codesourcery.com at the > end, and now Alexandre wants @redhat.com at the end? Thanks to both > companies for giving us so much free software work, but let's avoid any > company conflicts by avoiding use of either company's domain as much as we > can, OK? To do otherwise will just confuse people into thinking that > something is a single-company effort, when it is not. Joe, please bear in mind that all the non-GCC projects affected by this - there are quite a lot of them - are already hosted at sources.redhat.com and have their mailing lists there. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer