From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15046 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2003 23:48:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14957 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2003 23:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2003 23:48:07 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h59Nj7O18107; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:45:07 -0400 Received: from envy.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by envy.delorie.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h59Nj6Wp021132; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:45:06 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h59Nj3Tf021127; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:45:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 23:48:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200306092345.h59Nj3Tf021127@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: jbuck@synopsys.com CC: aoliva@redhat.com, cgf@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> (message from Joe Buck on Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:38:36 -0700) Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 > So first Christopher objects to a list having @codesourcery.com at > the end, and now Alexandre wants @redhat.com at the end? Thanks to > both companies for giving us so much free software work, but let's > avoid any company conflicts by avoiding use of either company's > domain as much as we can, OK? To do otherwise will just confuse > people into thinking that something is a single-company effort, when > it is not. Well, fair is fair. You want a list on gcc.gnu.org for a project that involves more non-gcc projects than gcc projects. Let's avoid any project conflicts by avoiding project names in the mailing list as much as we can, ok? To do otherwise will just confuse people into thinking that something is a single-project effort, when it is not. Most of the projects involved in this switch happen to be hosted on sources.redhat.com, so it makes sense to put the mailing list there. Heck, even gcc itself is hosted on sources.redhat.com.