From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14191-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28572 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2003 02:58:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28553 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 02:58:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 02:58:34 -0000
Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id 1A5B16C517; Mon,  9 Jun 2003 22:58:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 02:58:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x
Message-ID: <20030610025833.GA22233@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <ork7buc0yx.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> <oru1ayahd4.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <oru1ayahd4.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:47:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>On Jun  9, 2003, Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
>> So first Christopher objects to a list having @codesourcery.com at the
>> end, and now Alexandre wants @redhat.com at the end?
>
>Heck, sorry.  It's just that, whenever I post a patch that affects the
>toplevel, I have to cross-post it to half a dozen lists
>@sources.redhat.com, and one @gcc.gnu.org.  I wouldn't mind having the
>list @gcc.gnu.org, since gcc is allegedly the master copy.  I didn't
>mean to push for @sources.redhat.com, I just meant to say I've always
>wanted such a list.
>
>>let's avoid any company conflicts by avoiding use of either company's
>>domain as much as we can, OK?
>
>You surely have a good point.  I don't, and I couldn't disagree with
>it.  toplevel@gcc.gnu.org, deal?

Why not remove all of the awful taint of sources.redhat.com and call it
toplevel-devtools@gnu.org?

cgf