From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4354 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2003 14:23:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4304 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 14:23:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.187.230.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 14:23:06 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id DD8536C517; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:23:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Zack Weinberg , Joe Buck , DJ Delorie , aoliva@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Message-ID: <20030610142305.GA1643@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , Zack Weinberg , Joe Buck , DJ Delorie , aoliva@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> <200306092345.h59Nj3Tf021127@envy.delorie.com> <20030609173251.A20668@synopsys.com> <873ciitunz.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <1055227336.9370.14.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1055227336.9370.14.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:42:15PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >Zack took proactive action to try to move towards solving an important >problem. He set up a short-term list to try to involve people in an >open discussion about what needed to be done. I'm disappointed that the >responses are dealing with the domain name and not with the topic at >hand. I apologize for even raising an opinion. I appreciate Zack's intent. I agree that a lot of discussion about this issue is silly, so unless there is a consensus that we (i.e., I) should set up a toplevel mailing list, I think that we should just use Zack's list and move on to actually doing the work it was designed to foster.