From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1869 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2003 16:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1847 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 16:40:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.187.230.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 16:40:31 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 27F686C517; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:40:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Message-ID: <20030610164031.GA19400@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> <200306092345.h59Nj3Tf021127@envy.delorie.com> <20030609173251.A20668@synopsys.com> <873ciitunz.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <1055227336.9370.14.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <1055260613.9414.38.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1055260613.9414.38.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >That's all well and good, but the basic point certainly remains: we've >worked very hard to make GCC appear to come entirely from a machine >named gcc.gnu.org, and similar work has not been done for GDB, binutils, >glibc, etc. Red Hat domain names and logos appear frequently on those >web pages. If anyone has specific examples, I'll see about getting this changed. I didn't see anything at a quick glance. I know that the cvs instructions (obviously?) specify sources.redhat.com but I don't know why there should be Red Hat logos on FSF projects. That's just wrong. FWIW, I removed some of the more flashy logos from some of the sources.redhat.com web pages a while ago. cgf