From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1028 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2003 16:24:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1010 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2003 16:24:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2003 16:24:02 -0000 Received: from dsl093-172-017.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.17] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19Vw1w-0004uT-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:24:56 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19Vw10-0007id-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:23:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "J. Johnston" Cc: David Carlton , gdb , Elena Zannoni , msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: status of NTPL patches Message-ID: <20030627162358.GA29641@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "J. Johnston" , David Carlton , gdb , Elena Zannoni , msnyder@redhat.com References: <20030627155234.GA25134@nevyn.them.org> <3EFC6E10.9080006@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EFC6E10.9080006@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00511.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:17:20PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > > > >>What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet? > >>I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm > >>allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat > >>9.0 yet. > > > > > >I believe that it should work. > > > > They are all committed except for Michael's rewrite of the gcore patch > which I haven't > seen a commit notice for yet. I don't see any reason it can't be checked > in - Michael? Do you mean: 2003-06-19 Michael Snyder * linux-nat.h: New file. * linux-nat.c: Include linux-nat.h. * lin-lwp.c: Include linux-nat.h. Move struct lwp_info def to linux-nat.h. * linux-proc.c: Include linux-nat.h. (linux_make_note_section): Iterate over lwps instead of threads. (linux_do_thread_registers): Use lwp instead of merged pid. * config/nm-linux.h: Move miscelaneous def'ns to linux-nat.h. * Makefile.in (lin-lwp.o, linux-proc.o, linux-nat.o): Add dependency on linux_nat_h. ? > There is also an unresolved issue with gdbserver. That's a bit of an understatement... well, hopefully it won't be too hard, but I won't have time to look at it for another project or two. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer