From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 870 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2003 03:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 840 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2003 03:20:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO otisco.McKusick.COM) (209.31.233.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2003 03:20:37 -0000 Received: (from hilfingr@localhost) by otisco.McKusick.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5U3KYb24696; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:20:34 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:48:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200306300320.h5U3KYb24696@otisco.McKusick.COM> From: "Paul N. Hilfinger" To: aj@suse.de CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Jaeger on Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:52:35 +0200) Subject: Re: Ada support for GDB 6? Reply-to: Hilfinger@otisco.mckusick.com References: X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 I hope to (finally) get around to submitting the necessary patches over the next few weeks. It will take some time and occur in stages, since for various reasons, quite a few places in GDB are affected (and need hooks installed so that Ada-related code is confined for the most part to the ada-* files). You are right that it should not go into the official release. Paul Hilfinger