From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14808-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11282 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 14:35:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11275 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 14:35:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 14:35:08 -0000
Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12])
	by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6HEZ7VP014776;
	Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:35:07 -0500
Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6HEZ7HK013841;
	Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:35:07 -0500
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6HEZ7sb013840;
	Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:35:07 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:35:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200307171435.h6HEZ7sb013840@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: my 6.0 todo list
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2

On my list:

  gdb backtrace bugs
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1253
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1255

  dejagnu build issue
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/708

  red hat linux 9
    elena z how is it going?

Off the top of my head, my test bed isn't producing any regressions
besides the backtrace bugs.  But I won't swear that it is clean until
I get out the microscope though.

>From my last "5.3 versus HEAD" report,

  MI issues
    how is MI these days?

  x86-64 regressions
    how is it these days?

  multi-register variables
    fixed!

  java regression
    fixed!

  gcc HEAD -gstabs+
    The nastiest pr, gcc/10055, got fixed in gcc.

    There are other regressions with gcc HEAD with both dwarf-2 and
    stabs+ but this does not stop a gdb release.

I will put out a "5.3 versus gdb_6_0-branch" report next week.
I've been hoping for some of the backtrace bugs to get fixed first.

Michael C