From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14020 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 15:20:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13988 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 15:20:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 15:20:43 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UFKSin024119; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:20:28 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UFKSHK031464; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:20:28 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6UFKS1A031463; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:20:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:20:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307301520.h6UFKS1A031463@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, geoffk@apple.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Two possible function stabs patches X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 The results are in and patch #2 choked gdb (as Daniel J predicted). Regressions in: gdb.c++/anon-union.exp gdb.c++/classes.exp gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp gdb.c++/derivation.exp gdb.c++/local.exp gdb.c++/m-data.exp gdb.c++/method.exp gdb.c++/misc.exp gdb.c++/namespace.exp gdb.c++/overload.exp gdb.c++/ovldbreak.exp gdb.c++/pr-1023.exp gdb.c++/pr-1210.exp gdb.c++/printmethod.exp gdb.c++/psmang.exp gdb.c++/templates.exp gdb.c++/try_catch.exp gdb.c++/userdef.exp gdb.mi/gdb792.exp gdb.objc/basicclass.exp That's in gdb gdb_6_0-branch. Similar regressions with gdb 5.3 and gdb HEAD. Michael C