From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16589 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2003 04:16:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16575 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2003 04:16:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2003 04:16:52 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19jtFY-0003Wq-N1; Tue, 05 Aug 2003 00:16:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 04:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: cgd@broadcom.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Next for GDB Message-ID: <20030805041640.GA13510@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , cgd@broadcom.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3F2AFBD5.3040708@redhat.com> <3F2F2E85.8070805@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F2F2E85.8070805@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 12:11:49AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Also `making a dead cat bounce'. Layering a simulator over the top of > another target so the simulator uses the target for registers and > memory. Would make possible: > - less intrusive inferior function calls (don't write the results back) > - executing code on dead targets > - simulated single stepping > this would involve a lot more work so ... That has got to be one of the neatest ideas I've heard in a long time... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer