From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16697 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2003 17:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16664 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 17:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 17:12:49 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h76HCbPJ009701; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:12:37 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h76HCbHK012666; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:12:37 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h76HCY7P012664; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:12:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 17:12:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308061712.h76HCY7P012664@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@kealia.com Subject: Re: java crash from tom tromey Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > I'm very glad that Tom has provided a reproducible test case for this; > I would suggest checking it in to our test suite ASAP. It's my job to reduce it to a *.exp file, yes. > My only qualm with it is that I can't compile the test case myself, > because my installed GCJ (whatever came with Red Hat 8.0) doesn't > know about Arc2D. That would be gcj 3.2-7. I suspect that for meaningful Java testing, you need to have a more recent version of gcj anyways. I am using gcj HEAD. Anyways, the problem happens when a program calls type_from_class, so I expect that I can make a test case that builds with gcc 3.2-7. Michael C