From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22475 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2003 13:50:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22468 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 13:50:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2003 13:50:37 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19klA4-0007Hx-0C; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:50:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michal Ludvig Cc: gdb Subject: Re: [testsuite & dwarf2] How to handle store.exp failure on AMD64? Message-ID: <20030807135035.GA28000@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michal Ludvig , gdb References: <3F3212B7.8060003@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F3212B7.8060003@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:49:59AM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > 4) let GDB pretend that all registers have the same value unless said > otherwise later in the .debug_frame and convince GCC to put a note when > their value is overwritten. > > Opinions? See the archives of this list, from about a month ago. I discussed this with Richard but never got around to writing a patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer