From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10173 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 17:52:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10166 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 17:52:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 17:52:32 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7IHlOWs010565; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:47:24 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7IHlOHK003904; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:47:24 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7IHlOcQ003903; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:47:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:52:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308181747.h7IHlOcQ003903@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@kealia.com, drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: 6.0 issues Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 About that Java bug: how about if we document it in PROBLEMS, and also link to Tom Tromey's 1-line patch for it? IMHO the 1-line patch is a reasonable workaround and I am comfortable recommending it to people who encounter the problem. The bug: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1322 "internal-error: sect_index_text not initialized" after printing a java type The workaround: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-07/msg00259.html Actually I would need to make that more of a formal patch and then attach it to the PR. OK to do this for gdb 6.0? Michael C