From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12481 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2003 17:57:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12458 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2003 17:57:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2003 17:57:47 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7JHvjUg028052; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:57:45 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7JHvjHK022433; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:57:45 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7JHvju2022432; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:57:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:57:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308191757.h7JHvju2022432@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: More debug info test directories? X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 > What do people think of additional debug info directories vis: > > gdb.dw2 > gdb.dw1 Sounds good to me. Why not call them gdb.dwarf-1 and gdb.dwarf-2? Oh, because of the 8.3 uniqueness requirement. Sigh. Well, you could re-visit the issue of dwarf-1 support first. It may be too early to remove dwarf-1 support, but I think it's okay to not add any more dwarf-1 tests. The existing test suite gave, like, 50 ERRORs and 3500 FAILs the last time I ran it. And the only dwarf-1 compilers I know about are Absoft, Diab, and SCO's version of gcc. Michael C