From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-15379-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17558 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2003 20:49:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17548 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 20:49:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 20:49:35 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83KnXl19729
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 16:49:34 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83KnVL24764;
	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 16:49:31 -0400
Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83KnUw00775;
	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:49:30 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h83KnSk06685;
	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:49:28 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 20:49:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gcc HEAD moves line number directives -- gcc bug?
Message-ID: <20030903204927.GR6487@redhat.com>
References: <200309020328.h823SW1F013673@duracef.shout.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200309020328.h823SW1F013673@duracef.shout.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:28:32PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Okay, then I won't file a gcc PR about the 'leal' insn moving up from line 24
> to line 23.  I'm still kinda wary and sensitive about it though.

Go ahead and do file it, and mark it low priority.  We might see
about marking new generated insns as "coming from" the insn for
which they are generated.


r~