From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23852 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 23:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23845 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 23:57:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 23:57:33 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 25E986C700; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:57:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:57:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc 2 survey Message-ID: <20030919235727.GB17343@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200309192210.h8JMAltE021584@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309192210.h8JMAltE021584@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:10:47PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: >gcc 2 survey >2003-09-19 >mec@shout.net > >Here is a bunch of data that I researched on platforms that still >use gcc 2. > >At this time I am continuing to test with gcc 2.95.3, and I recommend that >we keep fixing any gdb regressions that happen with gcc 2.95.3. > >Michael C > >. Three-line summary > > gcc 2: openbsd, netbsd, freebsd, debian, lindows, xandros, lycoris, apple, sco > gcc 3: red hat, mandrake, suse, slackware, conectiva, knoppix, gentoo > gcc 3: hurd, cygwin Cygwin falls into this list, too. It has a separate gcc2 package. cgf