From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10628 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 20:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10615 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 20:02:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.187.230.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 20:02:59 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 58CDB6C70D; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:02:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:03:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Problem with COM1 port with GDB 5.3 under cygwin 1.5.* Message-ID: <20030924200257.GA7238@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <3F7099F4.1010405@macdonnell.ca> <3F71C7A8.7070200@macdonnell.ca> <9003-Wed24Sep2003201405+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9003-Wed24Sep2003201405+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:14:06PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:34:48 -0600 >> From: Creighton MacDonnell >> >> >Also, what happens with versions of Cygwin other than 1.5.x? Could >> >they be broken by this change? >> > >> GDB 5.3 with my patch, compiled under Cygwin 1.3.*, will run without >> being recompiled under 1.5.* too. > >Then I don't have any objections to this patch. However, the Cygwin >port is not my responsibility in GDB maintenance, so you will have to >wait for Chris Faylor to approve this. I already responded that I don't believe I have the authority to approve changes to this file. cgf