From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18750 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2004 04:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18730 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 04:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 04:37:52 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Ba5hb-0008Dc-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:37:39 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1234A4B104; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:37:51 -0400 (EDT) To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, bje+dated+1087704907.2cacdb@air.net.au, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Message-Id: <20040615043751.1234A4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:37:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 bje> I propose that src/expect be removed from the tree 7 days from now bje> (2004-06-22 04:00Z). The version in src is now many years old. I've bje> already sent most of the local patches upstream to Don Libes and have bje> just a handful to go. Others have suggested leaving in support for an bje> in-tree Expect and I think that's reasonable. Okay by me. Michael C