public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
	Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1087704905.a97384@air.net.au>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040615225644.GA15439@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r7sgzc8p.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:29:26PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Jun 15, 2004, Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >
> >> And on the other side, I have repeatedly been burnt by systems with
> >> tcl/expect headers installed globally which are incompatible with the
> >> stuff in /cvs/src.  I'd be much happier if tcl/tk/expect were all
> >> three removed from src.
> >
> > My point is that you don't have to check them out if you don't want
> > to.  If it's just there for those who need it, it can't possibly
> > hurt.
> 
> It is surprisingly difficult to check out gdb without getting tcl/tk
> as well.  This is probably nothing to do with Ben, though.

That's got nothing to do with getting rid of the in-tree
expect/dejagnu; that has to do with the (long overdue) project to move
Insight out of the GDB directory.  If it were separate, the top-level
rules could be less insistent about ./gdb/ requiring ./tcl/.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-15 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-15  4:15 Ben Elliston
2004-06-15 20:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-06-15 21:32   ` Zack Weinberg
2004-06-15 22:24     ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-06-15 22:29       ` Zack Weinberg
2004-06-15 22:56         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-06-15 23:07         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-15 23:40           ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-15 22:50       ` Joe Buck
2004-06-16  3:34         ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-06-16  3:35           ` Ben Elliston
2004-06-16  6:11             ` Joel Brobecker
2004-06-16  6:15               ` Ben Elliston
2004-06-16  7:08                 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-06-16 13:46                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-16 16:30                   ` Joe Buck
2004-06-16 19:53                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-06-16 22:48                       ` Ben Elliston
2004-06-16 16:27           ` Joe Buck
2004-06-15 22:43   ` Ben Elliston
2004-06-15  4:37 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-16 15:31 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-17  3:24 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-17 17:30 ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040615225644.GA15439@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=bje+dated+1087704905.a97384@air.net.au \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).