From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-18342-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4266 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2004 16:30:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3966 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 16:29:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vaxjo.synopsys.com) (198.182.60.75)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 16:29:57 -0000
Received: from mother.synopsys.com (mother.synopsys.com [146.225.100.171])
	by vaxjo.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3C1FFDB3A; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piper.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mother.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA07654;
	Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i5GGTrR16286;
	Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:29:53 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: piper.synopsys.com: jbuck set sender to Joe.Buck@synopsys.com using -f
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:30:00 -0000
From: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1087798498.8ed310@air.net.au>,
	Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>,
	Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect
Message-ID: <20040616092953.B13335@synopsys.com>
References: <20040615141501.A19302@mailhub.air.net.au> <orpt808sqv.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <87zn74zevv.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com> <ord6408non.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20040615154957.A5587@synopsys.com> <orpt8018ih.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20040616133517.A26041@mailhub.air.net.au> <20040616061117.GA1502@gnat.com> <20040616161454.A26988@mailhub.air.net.au> <or7ju80yl0.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <or7ju80yl0.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>; from aoliva@redhat.com on Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:08:27AM -0300
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:08:27AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2004, Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1087798498.8ed310@air.net.au> wrote:
> 
> > I meant who is going to keep src/expect up to date?  The version
> > that's there has not been touched since the initial sourceware import
> > in November 1999.
> 
> Do we have evidence that it's broken?  If so, we do need an update.
> If not, why can't we just leave it at the working state?

Yes, last I checked it resulted in failures on Solaris that I don't see
with version 5.40.0 (that is, when I switched from the infrastructure
version of expect to the official one, I suddenly no longer saw lots
of Java failures for Solaris).