From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9067 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2004 03:35:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8766 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 03:35:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhub.air.net.au) (203.52.201.202) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 03:35:29 -0000 Received: from mailhub.air.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.air.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487F636DE2 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:35:25 +1000 (EST) Received: by mailhub.air.net.au (tmda-sendmail, from uid 500); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:35:20 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 03:35:00 -0000 To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Joe Buck , Zack Weinberg , Ben Elliston , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Message-ID: <20040616133517.A26041@mailhub.air.net.au> References: <20040615141501.A19302@mailhub.air.net.au> <87zn74zevv.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com> <20040615154957.A5587@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from aoliva@redhat.com on Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:33:58AM -0300 From: Ben Elliston X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.86 (Venetian Way) X-Primary-Address: bje@air.net.au X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 463 > > I understand your issue; you want to quickly get going to test some > > obsure platforms. I think that the way to go about it is to have a > > doc pointing to the exact correct versions of Tcl, Expect, and DejaGNU > > to use. >=20 > And why is this better than having the exact correct versions in CVS, > such that people can optionally check it out and use them without a > separate install step? Who is going to do that work? History says "no one". Ben --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFAz7/1bNtDbHIEhSURAou6AJiBTlD8E5Qp6a0RByWkN3rA9p1yAKC1U5gO sz+qZOOhwv34M14qw03gaA== =eZk+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--