From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27535 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2004 22:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27182 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 22:48:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhub.air.net.au) (203.52.201.202) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 22:48:20 -0000 Received: from mailhub.air.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.air.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E83D36DE1 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:48:15 +1000 (EST) Received: by mailhub.air.net.au (tmda-sendmail, from uid 500); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:48:10 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:48:00 -0000 To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Joe Buck , Joel Brobecker , Zack Weinberg , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Message-ID: <20040617084807.A31693@mailhub.air.net.au> References: <87zn74zevv.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com> <20040615154957.A5587@synopsys.com> <20040616133517.A26041@mailhub.air.net.au> <20040616061117.GA1502@gnat.com> <20040616161454.A26988@mailhub.air.net.au> <20040616092953.B13335@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from aoliva@redhat.com on Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:52:54PM -0300 From: Ben Elliston X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.86 (Venetian Way) X-Primary-Address: bje@air.net.au X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 626 > That said, I'd still like to be able to have check outs of expect, > tcl, tk, dejagnu, etc, and soft-links to them within the uberbaum > tree, and have the just-built trees be used, as if the directories > were in the uberbaum repository. Sure; that was discussed and I think we all agreed that top-level support for those directories can stay. Personally, I think it would be better if that was removed in the long term, but we can revisit that on a rainy day (if only it would rain) :-) So I believe I now have 0 opponents to removing src/expect and, unless I hear otherwise, will remove it next Tuesday. Cheers, Ben --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA0M4nbNtDbHIEhSURAm4DAJ9tlDMFa2/3JeSmGi3ZWwideWwRswCeObzm rNhwgCbuvvIvjgcLwbNW6tk= =lpEW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--