From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2067 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2004 20:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2023 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2004 20:16:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao07.cox.net) (68.230.240.32) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2004 20:16:30 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040821201629.FOIT1823.lakermmtao07.cox.net@white>; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:16:29 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BycHt-0001xj-00; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:16:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:16:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Felix Lee Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB/XMI (XML Machine Interface) Message-ID: <20040821201629.GB7442@white> Mail-Followup-To: Felix Lee , Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com References: <20040820125443.GB5703@white> <20040820183447.GA21565@nevyn.them.org> <20040820184900.GA5806@white> <20040820185159.GA22481@nevyn.them.org> <20040820192458.GB5806@white> <20040820194224.GA24407@nevyn.them.org> <20040820195928.GA6372@white> <01c48768$Blat.v2.2.2$a38a12a0@zahav.net.il> <20040821123440.GA7138@white> <20040821192811.2B2E1511B4A@stray.canids> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040821192811.2B2E1511B4A@stray.canids> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:28:11PM -0700, Felix Lee wrote: > Bob Rossi : > > I believe that making GDB output XML would be trivial. > > ok, so submit a patch to implement --interpreter=xml. > -- Well of course I was going to implement a patch, or at least try. The point is to get some sort of consensus as to if the patch would be approved. I would think it not very nice of the GDB team to set me loose on this patch, and then outright reject it. Where is the open source camaraderie? Thanks, Bob Rossi