From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28023 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2004 20:07:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27960 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 20:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2004 20:07:29 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8OK7NJ9021408; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:07:24 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8OK7Nr22121; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:07:23 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8OK7N707942; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:07:23 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8OK7Mdw000866; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:07:23 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8OK7Mh6000862; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:07:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200409242007.i8OK7Mh6000862@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: kcook@gcc.gnu.org CC: hilfingr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU, gdb@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040924184801.10426.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> (message from Kelley Cook on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:48:01 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: bison problem References: <20040924184801.10426.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 > BTW, DJ to prevent this from happening again, would it be possible > to just delete ylwrap from GCC's - but not from src's - toplevel > directory as it is not used anywhere within GCC. If it's part of the package we import, we should find some other solution to such things - like testing - and leave the files in sync in both places. I'd rather not have different fractions of some package in each of gcc and src.