From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32721 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 17:24:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32712 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 17:24:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 17:24:18 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFFWF-0002Gq-TF; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:24:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Dave Korn , 'Eli Zaretskii' , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: probing GDB for MI versions Message-ID: <20041006172403.GA8694@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Korn , 'Eli Zaretskii' , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20041006170513.GG12213@white> <20041006172138.GI12213@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041006172138.GI12213@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:21:38PM -0400, 'Bob Rossi' wrote: > I guess the bottom line is, I already have a parser that is capable of > dealing with a specific version of MI's output. I don't want to start up > MI with an adhoc parser, just to figure out what real parser I should > use. This seems not correct to me, and I guess it's the issue to deal > with. You've got a hammer and are attempting to create a nail. It seems eminently correct to me, and to Dave too I think. -- Daniel Jacobowitz