From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3527 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 19:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3518 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 19:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao05.cox.net) (68.230.240.34) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 19:20:56 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20041006192056.FZFA24407.lakermmtao05.cox.net@white>; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:20:56 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFHLL-0003QU-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:20:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:25:00 -0000 From: 'Bob Rossi' To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Dave Korn , 'Eli Zaretskii' , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: probing GDB for MI versions Message-ID: <20041006192055.GQ12213@white> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Dave Korn , 'Eli Zaretskii' , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <41643C45.4050407@gnu.org> <20041006185034.GO12213@white> <41644484.50203@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41644484.50203@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:16:20PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >>>I find this focus on such pedantic details both puzzling and time > >>>wasting. Especially given that any code intended to handle multiple MI > >>>variants must be adhoc. Otherwize it won't work with all the variants > >>>that pre-date the above - mi0, mi1, mi2 (prior to the above extension. > > s/handle multiple/handle initial negotiation of multiple/ > > As everyone else has pointed out, with the negitiation done, the real > parser can be loaded. Yes, this is obvious and it's not the problem. Bob Rossi