From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2242 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2004 20:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2223 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2004 20:50:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU) (128.32.153.227) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2004 20:50:06 -0000 Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/3.141592645) with ESMTP id i97Ko32Y008718; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (hilfingr@localhost) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id i97KnwH1008715; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410072049.i97KnwH1008715@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ada vs identical flex In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew Cagney of "Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:43:33 EDT." <41659C65.2090603@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8711.1097182198.1@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 02:32:00 -0000 From: Paul Hilfinger X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 > I'm comparing the generated ada-lex.c output from FLEX 2.5.2. Yes, > that's comparing the output from the same "identical" FLEX - one is > found on NetBSD/PPC 1.6.2, and the other on FC3. We'll look at it, but that's a REALLY old flex (on GDB, I never built with anything <2.5.4, and that was from ~1997; latest rev is more like 2.5.31). Paul