From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bob's MI objective
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 16:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041008134218.GA1467@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c4ad2b$Blat.v2.2.2$f25b86a0@zahav.net.il>
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 01:41:50PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:32:43 -0400
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> >
> > > * I would like to know what GDB's policy is in regards to supporting old
> > > MI protocols. ( I have received several opposing views on this )
> >
> > A new way to phrase this would be, for a given release of GDB (not a CVS
> > snapshot), does that release support one MI protocol, or does it support
> > several MI protocols. The MI protocols need to be tested and stable.
>
> The answer to this is that, although the latest stable MI version is
> probably the most stable version to rely upon, the old MI versions are
> also supported to the degree that there are tests in the test suite
> that exercise them. For example, currently there are tests for mi1
> although the latest MI version is mi2.
That's not true any more; there were, and they were removed. My
understanding is that we have been keeping the last stable protocol in
addition to the current development protocol. Of course, there is not
much in the way of sample size here!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-08 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 20:13 Andrew Cagney
2004-10-06 22:36 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-07 2:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-07 17:20 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-07 20:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-07 22:42 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-08 8:40 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-08 13:17 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-08 7:17 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-08 12:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-08 13:23 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-08 13:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-08 16:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-08 16:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-10-08 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-09 11:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-10 4:06 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-11 2:00 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-11 14:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-11 17:22 ` Bob Rossi
2004-10-12 22:15 ` Michael Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041008134218.GA1467@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).