From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29906 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2004 13:44:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29879 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 13:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 13:44:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFv2k-0000RA-Jp for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 09:44:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 18:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: probing GDB for MI versions Message-ID: <20041008134422.GC1467@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20041003170104.GC7030@white> <41644306.2090603@gnu.org> <20041006191950.GP12213@white> <41645106.1060106@gnu.org> <01c4ad16$Blat.v2.2.2$426de2c0@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c4ad16$Blat.v2.2.2$426de2c0@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:09:42 -0400 > > From: Andrew Cagney > > Cc: GDB > > > > I'm simply pointing out the obvious - what we don't test [likely] > > doesn't work. > > Well, that's true, but there _are_ tests for mi1 in testsuite/gdb.mi. Removed on 2004-02-13... -- Daniel Jacobowitz