From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16950 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2004 15:11:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16941 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2004 15:11:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2004 15:11:28 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CIqCo-0001KF-Fl; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:10:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Chastain Cc: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] HP-UX native support Message-ID: <20041016151049.GA4558@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Chastain , kettenis@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200410152226.i9FMQd8J001218@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <41713868.nailIAJ11B157@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41713868.nailIAJ11B157@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 11:04:08AM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote: > Some scraps of thought: > > In general, I'm okay with dropping support for follow-fork and > other hpux-only features. FYI, follow-fork is no longer an HP-UX specific feature. Mark, I think it's a good idea, but I'm not an HP-UX user, so... The bit I most want to see die is the SOM and HP-UX debug format readers, but that's a different problem. -- Daniel Jacobowitz