From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com,
fnasser@redhat.com
Subject: Re: patch review time
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 15:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050305152751.GA4312@white> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c52176$Blat.v2.4$311d79c0@zahav.net.il>
> > What if the particular maintainer is busy?
>
> You should complain to the head maintainer.
Who is that? The MAINTAINERS file mentions no such position.
BTW, 2 of the MI MAINTAINERS completely do *nothing*. They don't respond
to Emails, they don't review patches, and as far as I can tell, do
nothing behind the scene.
Shouldn't they be removed from this position, since, IMO, they are *not*
maintaining the code. I think having 3 maintainers under the section
mi (gdb/mi) Andrew Cagney cagney@redhat.com
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@redhat.com
Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com
is misleading. Since Andrew is the *only* one I can tell is maintaining
code for MI, even if it's not at the speed that I desire.
Bob Rossi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-05 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 15:02 Bob Rossi
2005-03-04 7:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-04 14:26 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-04 14:59 ` Dave Korn
2005-03-04 15:36 ` 'Bob Rossi'
2005-03-04 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-04 15:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-04 17:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-04 22:17 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-05 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-05 15:27 ` Bob Rossi [this message]
2005-03-05 17:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-05 17:17 ` Kip Macy
2005-03-06 4:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-06 6:24 ` Kip Macy
2005-03-06 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-06 20:20 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-05 20:34 Nick Roberts
2005-03-05 22:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-05 22:15 ` Kip Macy
2005-03-06 13:45 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-06 15:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-06 18:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-06 0:11 ` Russell Shaw
2005-03-06 13:48 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-06 18:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-06 20:17 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-03-06 20:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-07 4:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-07 23:49 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050305152751.GA4312@white \
--to=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=cagney@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).