From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29101 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2005 15:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29076 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2005 15:27:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao04.cox.net) (68.230.240.35) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2005 15:27:49 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050305152747.FWES11124.lakermmtao04.cox.net@white>; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:27:47 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D7bC3-00017r-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:27:51 -0500 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 15:27:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: patch review time Message-ID: <20050305152751.GA4312@white> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com References: <20050303150022.GD32613@white> <01c5208c$Blat.v2.4$989a81a0@zahav.net.il> <20050304142600.GA2419@white> <01c520d0$Blat.v2.4$bbe28c40@zahav.net.il> <20050304155441.GC2419@white> <01c520e0$Blat.v2.4$f07527a0@zahav.net.il> <20050304221656.GD2419@white> <01c52176$Blat.v2.4$311d79c0@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c52176$Blat.v2.4$311d79c0@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 > > What if the particular maintainer is busy? > > You should complain to the head maintainer. Who is that? The MAINTAINERS file mentions no such position. BTW, 2 of the MI MAINTAINERS completely do *nothing*. They don't respond to Emails, they don't review patches, and as far as I can tell, do nothing behind the scene. Shouldn't they be removed from this position, since, IMO, they are *not* maintaining the code. I think having 3 maintainers under the section mi (gdb/mi) Andrew Cagney cagney@redhat.com Elena Zannoni ezannoni@redhat.com Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com is misleading. Since Andrew is the *only* one I can tell is maintaining code for MI, even if it's not at the speed that I desire. Bob Rossi