From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11428 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2005 20:20:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11369 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2005 20:20:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao05.cox.net) (68.230.240.34) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2005 20:20:43 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050306202043.UWBX3789.lakermmtao05.cox.net@white>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:20:43 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D82F4-0001cq-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:20:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:20:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Kip Macy , kmacy@fsmware.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: patch review time Message-ID: <20050306202045.GE5776@white> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Kip Macy , kmacy@fsmware.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20050304155441.GC2419@white> <01c520e0$Blat.v2.4$f07527a0@zahav.net.il> <20050304221656.GD2419@white> <01c52176$Blat.v2.4$311d79c0@zahav.net.il> <20050305152751.GA4312@white> <01c521a6$Blat.v2.4$6df22280@zahav.net.il> <20050305091714.Q72739@demos.bsdclusters.com> <01c52207$Blat.v2.4$432c0140@zahav.net.il> <01c5227d$Blat.v2.4$bffb48e0@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c5227d$Blat.v2.4$bffb48e0@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 08:52:11PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:24:19 -0800 > > From: Kip Macy > > Cc: Kip Macy , bob@brasko.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com, > > cagney@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com > > > > Where are these rules written down? > > Perhaps nowhere (why ask me?). However, this issue came up before, > and when it did, what I said was the conclusion we reached. You will > probably find the discussions in archives. Look's like someone knows how to ask a maintainer to step down, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gdb-discuss/2004-02/msg00071.html Again, as Nick made me realize, I'm not interested in people stepping down, I'm just interested in contributing to GDB. The fact that there is 3 maintainers in MI, and in 1.5 years, I've only seen one of them contribute makes me uncomfortable. In fact, Elena reviewed my first patch to MI, then something terrible happened in GDB, and that was the last I've seen of her ... Bob Rossi