From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8655 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2005 23:49:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8617 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 23:48:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao12.cox.net) (68.230.240.27) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 23:48:59 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050307234855.SUJK2476.lakermmtao12.cox.net@white>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:48:55 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8Ry6-0002KM-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:48:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:49:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: rjshaw@netspace.net.au, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: patch review time Message-ID: <20050307234858.GA8931@white> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , rjshaw@netspace.net.au, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <16938.5992.336181.640228@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050305220619.GA4481@white> <422A4B04.40507@netspace.net.au> <20050306134803.GC5776@white> <01c5227d$Blat.v2.4$27e1e820@zahav.net.il> <20050306202926.GF5776@white> <01c522cf$Blat.v2.4$482fe440@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c522cf$Blat.v2.4$482fe440@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:35:48AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:29:26 -0500 > > From: Bob Rossi > > Cc: rjshaw@netspace.net.au, gdb@sources.redhat.com > > > > The reason I blame everyone, and not anyone in particular, is because if > > the GDB community really cared about contributions from the outside, the > > GDB community would change the process to make it happen, no matter what > > the cost. > > The GDB community tried to do that, and it continues trying. I appreciate the effort, and will follow suite with the experienced maintainers on this issue. I hope that some solution is reached so that I can contribute to GDB in a timely fashion. Until then, my patches will be silently waiting at gdb-patches ... Thanks, Bob Rossi