From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5285 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2005 14:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4881 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 14:52:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 14:52:40 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1DCIq3-0006Id-C6; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:52:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kris Warkentin Cc: GDB Subject: Re: Possibly dumb signal mapping question Message-ID: <20050318145234.GA24185@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Warkentin , GDB References: <20050317223306.GA20195@nevyn.them.org> <423AE9EF.2070401@qnx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <423AE9EF.2070401@qnx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:47:11AM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >Your stub should be doing this. The TARGET_SIGNAL_* constants are the > >on-the-wire values. > > > > Thanks Daniel. I guess I've got to do it the hard way. I had just > asked because I thought there might be some magic mapping routine like > for the i386 registers. No, there isn't - you could do it in your remote protocol target (don't you use a different protocol?) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC