From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 644 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2005 02:35:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32753 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2005 02:35:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2005 02:35:16 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2S2ZFpn000539; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:35:15 -0500 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2S2ZFO22257; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:35:15 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2S2ZEh32019; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:35:14 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2S2ZAwV010754; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:35:11 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j2S2Z4vS010751; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:35:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200503280235.j2S2Z4vS010751@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: ian@airs.com CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 27 Mar 2005 21:19:42 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH/libiberty] Add missing in unlink-if-ordinary.c References: <200503261421.j2QEL6ll019253@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <16965.28989.543273.976317@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <200503261438.j2QEcTxo024182@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200503280207.j2S27WBR010185@greed.delorie.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 > is not an ISO C header file. But it is in POSIX.1. > And it is available on every Unix system. Because of that, it is > available on every Unix workalike system. Right, but the machines that wouldn't have it, probably would have K&R compilers anyway. We haven't had a problem using it unprotected so far, and there's even less reason to worry about it now.