From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21517-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9064 invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 20:35:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8678 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 20:35:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 20:35:07 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4HKZ1nB012087;
	Tue, 17 May 2005 22:35:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4HKZ0x1013033;
	Tue, 17 May 2005 22:35:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j4HKZ0oa028608;
	Tue, 17 May 2005 22:35:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 20:35:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200505172035.j4HKZ0oa028608@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: shebs@apple.com
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <428A3FB7.8070008@apple.com> (message from Stan Shebs on Tue, 17
	May 2005 12:02:15 -0700)
Subject: Re: Orphans to adopt?
References:  <428A3FB7.8070008@apple.com>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2

   Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:02:15 -0700
   From: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>

   After a month of distraction, I'm back on the Darwin GDB case,
   and for regression testing purposes it would be convenient to set
   up a random embedded target with a simulator. To make the fiddling
   do double duty, it occurs to me that I could adopt a target that
   is being neglected, although a cursory scan suggests that all
   adoptable targets are taken now. Does anybody have suggestions for
   a target in need of a little tenderness and cuddling? (hmm, sounds
   creepy that way :-) )

Hmm, powerpc could really, really use some cleanup, but hardly
qualifies as a random embedded target in your case ;-).  Then there is
arm, which also uses some deprecated functionality that could use some
attention.

Mark