From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25903 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 13:27:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25833 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2005 13:27:44 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:27:44 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DryJy-0006tW-RL for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:27:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Formatting of function pointer value Message-ID: <20050711132742.GA26465@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20050708135810.GB17089@nevyn.them.org> <17106.5796.850869.491390@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050711130742.GB25755@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 05:12:47PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > There's limited facility for computing values with machine-readable > > results, probably because there has been limited need for it to date. > > So, > 1. It's not possible to avoid those {} in the current code, using MI or CLI. > 2. It's not likely that this will change > Right? That's the opposite of what I said. If there's a need for printing the values in some "raw" form, then a new MI command can be added to do so. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC