From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11682 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 16:03:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11663 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2005 16:03:37 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:03:37 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Ds0ko-0008JH-St; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:03:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Christophe LYON Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: dwarf2 frame unwinder assumptions on SP Message-ID: <20050711160334.GA31890@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christophe LYON , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <42D285AB.9E36C062@st.com> <20050711145053.GA29229@nevyn.them.org> <42D290FF.F665B4A1@st.com> <20050711154723.GA30937@nevyn.them.org> <42D29716.CCF93A0C@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42D29716.CCF93A0C@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 05:58:14PM +0200, Christophe LYON wrote: > I don't see what to do in init_reg without adding a new value to the > dwarf2_frame_reg_rule enum. Do you mean changing the semantics of > DWARF2_FRAME_REG_CFA and provide a frame_prev_register() method > to interpret it accordingly? No. Change it globally in dwarf2-frame.c, since the offset field is currently unused with that rule. I have the nagging feeling this has come up before, but I can't remember the conclusion. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC