From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12643 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2005 14:08:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12630 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2005 14:08:14 -0000 Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su (HELO zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su) (158.250.17.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:08:14 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1Dt4Nn-0001Ac-2t for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:08:12 +0400 Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su ([158.250.17.23]) by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dt4Nn-0001AY-1F for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:08:11 +0400 From: Vladimir Prus To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: problem debugging assembler functions Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200507141254.42149.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20050714134548.GB531@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050714134548.GB531@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507141808.09859.ghost@cs.msu.su> X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 On Thursday 14 July 2005 17:45, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:54:41PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > So, moving 'find_pc_line' above will reasult in extra lookup only if > > > > - the command is stepi/nexti, or > > > > - the first condition evaluates to true (which means we've entered > > > > undebuggable code) > > > > > > > > I have no idea is that's bad or not performance-wise, just clarifying > > > > what's going on. > > > > > > Hmm, that's encouraging! This might be a good improvement, then. > > > > So, is this change going in? > > > > I attach the patch I'm using locally for your reference. > > Generally nothing goes in without a patch being submitted (with > changelog, to gdb-patches). Okay, I'll post the patch there. > It sounds like you're doing a lot of work > on GDB; have you considered getting a copyright assignment on file? Am I required to do so? The two patches I've sent so far are fairly trivial. Thanks, Volodya