From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19348 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2005 13:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19336 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2005 13:20:25 -0000 Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao01.cox.net) (68.230.240.38) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:20:25 +0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050820132024.BYFG3097.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@white>; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:20:24 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1E6TGp-0005s7-00; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:20:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:20:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Michael Veksler Cc: Greg Law , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Julian Smith Subject: Re: Using C-s to forward search command history Message-ID: <20050820132023.GA20235@white> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Veksler , Greg Law , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Julian Smith References: <4305DACB.7010604@greglaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:19:33PM +0300, Michael Veksler wrote: > > > > > Greg Law wrote on 19/08/2005 16:12:43: > > If I've read the info pages correctly, I can use C-s in order to search > > the command history forwards. However, this sequence also seems to be > > the control sequence to suspend the terminal :-( > > > > Have I misunderstood, or is there a way round this? (It would be very > > useful for me to be able to search forwards). > > This is a terminal feature that interferes with your C-s use, > it is not a readline issue. The following line works for me. > I put it in my .kshrc, .cshrc, .zshrc startup files after > making sure this is an interactive shell: > stty -ixon That's interesting. Is the (stop/start) ^s/^q feature of the terminal even useful these days? Why is it defaulted on? Bob Rossi